CAT 2020 Slot 1 — VARC Question 24

Main Point IdentificationEasy

The passage given below is followed by four alternate summaries. Choose the option that best captures the essence of the passage.

For nearly a century most psychologists have embraced one view of intelligence. Individuals are born with more or less intelligence potential (I.Q.); this potential is heavily influenced by heredity and difficult to alter; experts in measurement can determine a person’s intelligence early in life, currently from paper-and-pencil measures, perhaps eventually from examining the brain in action or even scrutinizing his/her genome. Recently, criticism of this conventional wisdom has mounted. Biologists ask if speaking of a single entity called “intelligence” is coherent and question the validity of measures used to estimate heritability of a trait in humans, who, unlike plants or animals, are not conceived and bred under controlled conditions.

1. Biologists have questioned the long-standing view that ‘intelligence’ is a single entity and the attempts to estimate its heritability.

2. Biologists have started questioning psychologists' view of 'intelligence' as a measurable immutable characteristic of an individual.

3. Biologists have questioned the view that ‘intelligence’ is a single entity and the ways in which what is inherited.

4. Biologists have criticised that conventional wisdom that individuals are born with more or less intelligence potential.

Answer & solution

Correct answer: 1

Answer: 1

Solution

Easy

Pin the exact claim being criticised and who is criticising it, then keep the option that preserves every key element. Core idea: biologists now challenge the old psychologists’ view by questioning (a) whether “intelligence” is a single entity, and (b) the validity of measures used to estimate its heritability.

A

Option 1 — best. “Biologists have questioned the long-standing view that ‘intelligence’ is a single entity and the attempts to estimate its heritability.” This keeps both prongs precisely — the single-entity doubt and the heritability-estimation doubt. Complete and faithful.

B

Option 2. “…questioning psychologists’ view of ‘intelligence’ as a measurable immutable characteristic.” It captures the single-entity/measurability angle but omits the heritability-estimation point that the passage explicitly raises. Misses a key half.

C

Option 3. “…the single entity and the ways in which what is inherited.” A distortion — biologists question the validity of estimating heritability itself, not the “ways in which” intelligence is inherited. Wrong target.

D

Option 4. “…criticised the conventional wisdom that individuals are born with more or less intelligence potential.” It restates one old belief but omits the single-entity doubt and the heritability point — the actual substance of the criticism. Incomplete.

Best summary: Option 1. Key in 1.

Related Main Point Identification questions

See all Para Summary questions →
CAT 2020 Slot 1 VARC Q24 — Main Point Identification solution | TheCATExam